Using Bridge, Lightroom, and Photoshop Elements Organizer
I have a lot of photos—some come from my family going back 150 years, some I took in the days of film and have managed to scan, and some are from my digital camera. Like everyone else, I now seldom take one carefully crafted photograph when I can easily take one hundred, and then I have to find that one in one hundred later on. Fifteen years ago I would sort and duplicate photos to folders on my hard drives as my main organizing strategy. Several photos could belong in different categories, and copying them to each of those categories meant filling up my drives—fast. Not putting them in their different categories, however, meant searching for the one folder they landed in. Enter Collections, some smart, some dumb, but all saving space on my disks, and reducing the time it takes to locate the best of the best, or at least the ones I need right now.
Bridge, Photoshop Elements Organizer, and Lightroom all let you create Collections, but Elements calls them Albums. Each interface is slightly different, but basically they work about the same. You locate and select photos you want to keep together logically, but that don’t have to be in the same folder, such as vintage car photos, pictures of your cat, or the best two hundred photos out of the three thousand you took on your weekend trip to Disneyland. Instead of moving the files on your drives into new folders, you create an alias to their physical location, in the case of a Collection/Album (dumb), or you create and save search criteria that a Smart Collection/Album executes every time you open the Collection.
The advantage to Smart Collections is the photos are automatically added to your Smart Collection/Album when you Import photos that meet the search criteria to your catalog (Lightroom and Organizer) or put them on your hard drive under the directory the search criteria calls for (Bridge). The downside is the search can take a long time each time you open the collection, depending upon the scope of the search. The search has to be performed fresh every time.
I usually create Smart Collections/Albums for types of photos I take over time, although you should establish other criteria for any frequent searches you do for photos. Lightroom considers Smart Collections so important to an efficient workflow, it even creates some for you when you install the program, including the really useful “Without Keywords” Smart Collection.
My camera files are stored on my drive under a main folder (such as Camera Raw Files), with subfolders for each year. I create the subfolder for the year, but let Photo Downloader in Bridge or the Organizer generate the subfolders based on the date they were taken. You can easily create a similar setup when you import photos into Lightroom. This makes for a lot of folders to search through if you do it manually.
Once a year, it snows here. It’s a special enough occasion I always try to get some pictures. When I add keywords to the photos, I add “snow” as one of the keywords. Because I saved a search using the Raw Photos folder as the location, every time I open the Smart Collection for “Snow,” any folder inside the main folder that contains a file with that keyword will show up. I haven’t moved a single file, but when I want to scrap one of my snow pictures, I only have to look in that single “Snow” Collection.
I use (dumb) Collections for projects that are more temporary and restricted than Smart Collections. They’re dumb because they can’t think to search for anything. You can create them after you’re run a search and the dialog will ask if you want to include the search results in your Collection/Album, but it will never run that search for you.
What’s so great about dumb Collections, though, is you can put any photo you want into it. You don’t have to dream up some complex search criteria that would probably dredge up more photos than you wanted to deal with. So if you wanted to create a photo album from some of your Cancun vacation photos, but not all of them, you create a “Cancun” Collection/Album, and while previewing your Cancun photos, drag the ones you want into that collection. The actual photos, of course, remain in the same location on your hard drive, so if you physically move them somewhere else on the drive or delete them, a dumb Collection won’t be able to find them.
In Lightroom, you can make the Collection a target Collection, then simply press “b” to add a selected photo to it.
Lightroom uses Collections for yet one more reason. If you use Lightroom Mobile, you can sync a Collection to your phone or tablet. Now you can sit on your couch or wait for your order to get filled at the deli while making basic edits to your photos, but only after you’ve created a Collection that can sync between your desktop and your device.
Most importantly, if you have spent any time searching for photos to use in a project, you should never have to do that twice. Create a Smart or dumb Collection/Album whenever you have searched for photos that exist in more than one folder, or even in the same folder if you want to use a small subset of several hundred photos or more. It’s easy to remove photos from a dumb Collection, and easy to delete an entire Collection once it’s served its purpose. You’ve already done the hard part by selecting the photos in the first place, so save the results instead of searching over and over.